Introduction
It is hard to avoid hearing about Gunnar Morling’s "One Billion Row Challenge" these days, where the objective is to parse and compute the min, average and max value for various weather stations using the Java language. The data to analyze is a semicolon-separated list of rows that looks like this:
Hamburg;12.0
Bulawayo;8.9
Palembang;38.8
St. John's;15.2
Cracow;12.6
Bridgetown;26.9
Istanbul;6.2
Roseau;34.4
Conakry;31.2
Istanbul;23.0
As indicated by the name of the project, there are one billion such rows. I have struggled for several weeks not to enter the competition.
Anyway, I suspect there are some gains to be harvested if one knows the distribution of the values in the generated measurement.txt
file of size 13 GiB (hereafter called "the file") and in this short article, I want to share my findings.
It is hard to avoid hearing about Gunnar Morling’s "One Billion Row Challenge" these days, where the objective is to parse and compute the min, average and max value for various weather stations using the Java language. The data to analyze is a semicolon-separated list of rows that looks like this:
Hamburg;12.0
Bulawayo;8.9
Palembang;38.8
St. John's;15.2
Cracow;12.6
Bridgetown;26.9
Istanbul;6.2
Roseau;34.4
Conakry;31.2
Istanbul;23.0
As indicated by the name of the project, there are one billion such rows. I have struggled for several weeks not to enter the competition.
Anyway, I suspect there are some gains to be harvested if one knows the distribution of the values in the generated measurement.txt
file of size 13 GiB (hereafter called "the file") and in this short article, I want to share my findings.
Name Statistics
The names are UTF-8 coded and can occupy up 100 bytes of space.
Looking at the file, one can conclude that there are 413 distinct names. So, the number of stations is actually relatively limited. Holding these in hash tables or the like is not anticipated to take up a significant amount of memory.
The names are UTF-8 coded and can occupy up 100 bytes of space.
Looking at the file, one can conclude that there are 413 distinct names. So, the number of stations is actually relatively limited. Holding these in hash tables or the like is not anticipated to take up a significant amount of memory.
Length
Taking a look at the distribution of the byte length (as opposed to the UTF-8 length) of the various names (if decoded by String::getBytes
), we can see the following,
Size Frequency 3
2
4
18
5
42
6
87
7
66
8
57
9
47
10
26
11
26
12
17
13
9
14
4
15
2
16
6
17
1
18
1
24
1
26
1
Taking a look at the distribution of the byte length (as opposed to the UTF-8 length) of the various names (if decoded by String::getBytes
), we can see the following,
Size | Frequency |
---|---|
3 | 2 |
4 | 18 |
5 | 42 |
6 | 87 |
7 | 66 |
8 | 57 |
9 | 47 |
10 | 26 |
11 | 26 |
12 | 17 |
13 | 9 |
14 | 4 |
15 | 2 |
16 | 6 |
17 | 1 |
18 | 1 |
24 | 1 |
26 | 1 |
Appearance
The number of times a station appears in the file is very similar ranging from "Roseau" with 2,417,155 to "Chihuahua" with 2,425,899 appearances.
The number of times a station appears in the file is very similar ranging from "Roseau" with 2,417,155 to "Chihuahua" with 2,425,899 appearances.
Characters
Character values can (but do not have to) be stored as ASCII-values.
Taking a closer look at the actual characters making up the names using binary encoded values, we can see the following:
Value Char Frequency 0..32
0
32
[space]
181605826
33
0
34
0
35
0
36
0
37
0
38
0
39
'
12104970
40
(
2422734
41
)
2422734
42
*
0
43
+
0
44
,
4845007
45
-
14533546
46
.
9686377
47
/
0
48
0
0
49
1
0
50
2
0
51
3
0
52
4
0
53
5
0
54
6
0
55
7
0
56
8
0
57
9
0
58
0
59
0
60
0
61
0
62
0
63
0
64
0
65
A
82,312,102
66
B
99,268,251
67
C
94,430,447
68
D
70,215,892
69
E
14,526,993
70
F
16,957,547
71
G
33,899,137
72
H
50,855,379
73
I
12,102,959
74
J
26,634,842
75
K
53,262,607
76
L
72,646,247
77
M
99,292,126
78
N
55,695,661
79
O
31,475,791
80
P
79,892,902
81
Q
0
82
R
29,051,519
83
S
99,282,847
84
T
72,636,263
85
U
4,842,032
86
V
33,897,984
87
W
21,796,354
88
X
2,421,477
89
Y
19,373,396
90
Z
7,262,683
91
[
0
92
[back slash]
0
93
]
0
94
^
0
95
_
0
96
`
0
97
a
1,125,887,562
98
b
147,711,179
99
c
106,528,787
100
d
130,753,955
101
e
438,247,893
102
f
16,946,953
103
g
191,298,907
104
h
200,950,920
105
i
547,230,962
106
j
38,740,836
107
k
157,372,493
108
l
314,764,906
109
m
154,957,248
110
n
559,330,103
111
o
535,145,324
112
p
77,480,229
113
q
12,101,467
114
r
411,634,242
115
s
336,573,182
116
t
317,179,382
117
u
334,155,534
118
v
72,645,180
119
w
43,579,677
120
x
19,362,397
121
y
92,009,532
122
z
43,584,786
123
{
0
124
[bar]
0
125
}
0
126
~
0
127
[del]
0
128
0
129
0
130
4842294
131
2422260
132..152
0
153
2422260
154
0
155
0
156
2420126
157
0
158
0
159
0
160
0
161
0
162
0
163
0
164
0
165
0
166
0
167
0
168
4843781
169
29054839
170
0
171
0
172
0
173
2422053
174
0
175
0
176
2421256
177
0
178
0
179
0
180
0
181
0
182
0
183
0
184
2421983
185
0
186
0
187
0
188
4840135
189
0
190
0
191
0
192
0
193
0
194
0
195
46002917
196
4843516
197
4842294
198
0
199
0
200
2422260
201…256
0
Just considering characters a..z and not considering casing, we get the following table:
Char Frequency a
1,208,199,664
b
246,979,430
c
200,959,234
d
200,969,847
e
452,774,886
f
33,904,500
g
225,198,044
h
251,806,299
i
559,333,921
j
65,375,678
k
210,635,100
l
387,411,153
m
254,249,374
n
615,025,764
o
566,621,115
p
157,373,131
q
12,101,467
r
440,685,761
s
435,856,029
t
389,815,645
u
338,997,566
v
106,543,164
w
65,376,031
x
21,783,874
y
111,382,928
z
50,847,469
Here is what a frequency chart with the above figures looks like:
Character values can (but do not have to) be stored as ASCII-values.
Taking a closer look at the actual characters making up the names using binary encoded values, we can see the following:
Value | Char | Frequency |
---|---|---|
0..32 | 0 | |
32 | [space] | 181605826 |
33 | 0 | |
34 | 0 | |
35 | 0 | |
36 | 0 | |
37 | 0 | |
38 | 0 | |
39 | ' | 12104970 |
40 | ( | 2422734 |
41 | ) | 2422734 |
42 | * | 0 |
43 | + | 0 |
44 | , | 4845007 |
45 | - | 14533546 |
46 | . | 9686377 |
47 | / | 0 |
48 | 0 | 0 |
49 | 1 | 0 |
50 | 2 | 0 |
51 | 3 | 0 |
52 | 4 | 0 |
53 | 5 | 0 |
54 | 6 | 0 |
55 | 7 | 0 |
56 | 8 | 0 |
57 | 9 | 0 |
58 | 0 | |
59 | 0 | |
60 | 0 | |
61 | 0 | |
62 | 0 | |
63 | 0 | |
64 | 0 | |
65 | A | 82,312,102 |
66 | B | 99,268,251 |
67 | C | 94,430,447 |
68 | D | 70,215,892 |
69 | E | 14,526,993 |
70 | F | 16,957,547 |
71 | G | 33,899,137 |
72 | H | 50,855,379 |
73 | I | 12,102,959 |
74 | J | 26,634,842 |
75 | K | 53,262,607 |
76 | L | 72,646,247 |
77 | M | 99,292,126 |
78 | N | 55,695,661 |
79 | O | 31,475,791 |
80 | P | 79,892,902 |
81 | Q | 0 |
82 | R | 29,051,519 |
83 | S | 99,282,847 |
84 | T | 72,636,263 |
85 | U | 4,842,032 |
86 | V | 33,897,984 |
87 | W | 21,796,354 |
88 | X | 2,421,477 |
89 | Y | 19,373,396 |
90 | Z | 7,262,683 |
91 | [ | 0 |
92 | [back slash] | 0 |
93 | ] | 0 |
94 | ^ | 0 |
95 | _ | 0 |
96 | ` | 0 |
97 | a | 1,125,887,562 |
98 | b | 147,711,179 |
99 | c | 106,528,787 |
100 | d | 130,753,955 |
101 | e | 438,247,893 |
102 | f | 16,946,953 |
103 | g | 191,298,907 |
104 | h | 200,950,920 |
105 | i | 547,230,962 |
106 | j | 38,740,836 |
107 | k | 157,372,493 |
108 | l | 314,764,906 |
109 | m | 154,957,248 |
110 | n | 559,330,103 |
111 | o | 535,145,324 |
112 | p | 77,480,229 |
113 | q | 12,101,467 |
114 | r | 411,634,242 |
115 | s | 336,573,182 |
116 | t | 317,179,382 |
117 | u | 334,155,534 |
118 | v | 72,645,180 |
119 | w | 43,579,677 |
120 | x | 19,362,397 |
121 | y | 92,009,532 |
122 | z | 43,584,786 |
123 | { | 0 |
124 | [bar] | 0 |
125 | } | 0 |
126 | ~ | 0 |
127 | [del] | 0 |
128 | 0 | |
129 | 0 | |
130 | 4842294 | |
131 | 2422260 | |
132..152 | 0 | |
153 | 2422260 | |
154 | 0 | |
155 | 0 | |
156 | 2420126 | |
157 | 0 | |
158 | 0 | |
159 | 0 | |
160 | 0 | |
161 | 0 | |
162 | 0 | |
163 | 0 | |
164 | 0 | |
165 | 0 | |
166 | 0 | |
167 | 0 | |
168 | 4843781 | |
169 | 29054839 | |
170 | 0 | |
171 | 0 | |
172 | 0 | |
173 | 2422053 | |
174 | 0 | |
175 | 0 | |
176 | 2421256 | |
177 | 0 | |
178 | 0 | |
179 | 0 | |
180 | 0 | |
181 | 0 | |
182 | 0 | |
183 | 0 | |
184 | 2421983 | |
185 | 0 | |
186 | 0 | |
187 | 0 | |
188 | 4840135 | |
189 | 0 | |
190 | 0 | |
191 | 0 | |
192 | 0 | |
193 | 0 | |
194 | 0 | |
195 | 46002917 | |
196 | 4843516 | |
197 | 4842294 | |
198 | 0 | |
199 | 0 | |
200 | 2422260 | |
201…256 | 0 |
Just considering characters a..z and not considering casing, we get the following table:
Char | Frequency |
---|---|
a | 1,208,199,664 |
b | 246,979,430 |
c | 200,959,234 |
d | 200,969,847 |
e | 452,774,886 |
f | 33,904,500 |
g | 225,198,044 |
h | 251,806,299 |
i | 559,333,921 |
j | 65,375,678 |
k | 210,635,100 |
l | 387,411,153 |
m | 254,249,374 |
n | 615,025,764 |
o | 566,621,115 |
p | 157,373,131 |
q | 12,101,467 |
r | 440,685,761 |
s | 435,856,029 |
t | 389,815,645 |
u | 338,997,566 |
v | 106,543,164 |
w | 65,376,031 |
x | 21,783,874 |
y | 111,382,928 |
z | 50,847,469 |
Here is what a frequency chart with the above figures looks like:
Temperature Statistics
Chart 4, shows the temperature distribution.
I hope this can spark some ideas in the community. Good luck with your challenge entry!
Chart 4, shows the temperature distribution.
I hope this can spark some ideas in the community. Good luck with your challenge entry!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.